搜尋紀錄

簡譜：This Court reviews de novo a dismissal under Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Karty v. Mid-America Energy, Inc., 74 Mass. App. Ct. 25, 26 (2009). The Court accepts as true the well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint and draws all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor, but it need not accept legal conclusions or "threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action." Id. A motion to dismiss is properly allowed "unless 'it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of [his] claim which would entitle [him] to relief.'" Id. (quoting Nader v. Citron, 372 Mass. 96, 98 (1977)). Section 230 immunity presents a pure question of law that is appropriately resolved at the pleading stage. See Mass. Port Auth. v. Turo Inc., 487 Mass. 240, 240-41 (2021); Jane Doe No. 1 v. Backpage.com, LLC, 817 F.3d 12, 20 (1st Cir. 2016) (Section 230 "entitles service providers to 'immunity from suit'").
時間：2026/4/23 上午1:02:47